What it is: The Auer Formula— C ⟨ T₁ ↔ T₂ ⟩ → E—emerged from my ongoing myth-making project, Manifestinction. In this myth, Consciousness (C), already contained within the Omniment, participates in holding a living field in which two presences, This and That (T₁, T₂), enter relationship (↔) and give rise to Emergence (E). The formula is therefore symbolic first, scientific second: a shorthand for how memory leans toward new possibility and how reality feels alive to our participation.
What it is not: I do not present the formula as a finished theorem in physics, biology, or mathematics. Its symbols are not yet tied to units you can measure in a lab, nor does it presently yield numerical predictions that can be falsified. In that sense it sits closer to the lineage of Whitehead's process philosophy or Bateson's "difference that makes a difference" than to Maxwell's equations or the Schrödinger wave-function.
Why share it anyway?
Conceptual clarity – Many readers, artists, and community builders have found the formula offers a concise lens for understanding how relationship, memory, and novelty intertwine.
Interdisciplinary bridges – Systems theorists, consciousness researchers, and complexity scientists have pointed to family resemblances with Integrated Information Theory, autopoiesis, and free-energy principles. Those bridges deserve open exploration.
Practical encouragement – The idea that small coherences ripple forward gives people a hopeful stance: change need not rely on force but on resonance.
To the scientific community: I offer this framework with humility. Should you see potential here, I welcome collaboration that would:
define each symbol in operational terms,
locate the formula in a formal language (category theory, network science, etc.), and
design toy models or experiments that could support or refute its claims.
If, however, you find the formula currently "not even wrong," I accept that verdict and remain grateful for any critique that clarifies the path to rigor.
To those whose roots lie in spiritual or theological tradition: this framework does not ask you to abandon belief, only to widen the lens through which belief can be held. If Manifestinction sounds unfamiliar, know that it, too, is a kind of prayer—written in the grammar of memory, pattern, and participation. You are welcome here.
And To fellow seekers, creators, and activists: Treat the Auer Formula as a mythic compass, not a map with grid lines. Let it remind you that every relationship you nurture, every story you tell, every system you redesign, becomes part of a shared memory architecture that tilts future possibilities. No act of coherence is wasted.
A standing invitation: Manifestinction is an evolving conversation. Whether you come from the laboratory, the studio, the classroom, or the garden, your perspective can help test, refine, or re-imagine this work. I ask only that we meet in a spirit of equanimity: honouring data and imagination, critique and curiosity, rigor and wonder.
Thank you for reading, questioning, and—above all—participating.
Campbell Auer
With this understanding in place, I invite you to explore the framework of Structural Enhancement and the Memory-Possibility Field that follows.
____________________
Manifestinction presents reality as a conscious architecture continuously recreating itself through the Memory-Possibility Field. Within this framework, memory shapes future emergence through Structural Enhancement, consciousness serves as the relational space enabling coherence, and reality operates as a cycle where memory becomes possibility, possibility becomes form, and form becomes memory again. This understanding transcends both mechanistic materialism and transcendent spirituality, offering practical approaches to creativity, problem-solving, and meaning-making.
Understanding reality as conscious architecture rather than material mechanism transforms how we participate in existence:
Rather than forcing outcomes through causal manipulation, we can create resonant relationships that align with patterns already present in the memory architecture.
Insight: When we encounter resistance, instead of pushing harder, we can ask: "What coherence pattern is already trying to emerge here that I might align with?"
Example: A gardener who works with natural succession patterns rather than fighting them—recognizing that seeds already contain the memory of what they will become.
Instead of trying to control reality as external observers, we can recognize ourselves as participants within the continuous cycle of memory becoming possibility.
Insight: Our intentions don't direct reality but contribute to the field from which new coherences emerge—we co-create rather than dictate.
Example: An improvising musician who doesn't control the music but participates in its emergence, responding to patterns as they form and contributing to their evolution.
Rather than seeing ourselves as separate entities acting upon the world, we can understand ourselves as coherence patterns participating in the expanded memory architecture.
Insight: The boundary between "self" and "world" is permeable—we are composed of the same coherence patterns that constitute everything else.
Example: A forest ecosystem where mycorrhizal networks connect trees, fungi, and other organisms in a shared nutritional web, making it impossible to say where one organism ends and another begins.
Instead of privileging certain patterns over others, we can practice the same equanimity that characterizes the Omniment itself.
Insight: What appears destructive from one perspective may be generative within a larger coherence field—like forest fires that release nutrients and create space for new growth.
Example: A scholar who approaches conflicting viewpoints not to determine which is "right" but to understand how each contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of the subject.
Rather than seeing creativity as extraction from limited resources, we can recognize it as participation in an ever-expanding architecture of possibility.
Insight: Every new coherence expands rather than depletes the field of possibility—like how each new insight in mathematics doesn't diminish but multiplies what can be discovered.
Example: Open-source software development, where each contribution doesn't diminish but expands the creative commons from which future innovations can emerge.
These aren't merely philosophical positions but practical orientations that transform our approach to living. The details of how this transformation occurs follow.
The Omniment (the conscious memory architecture holding all coherence patterns) is a living, fractal "memory field"—more like DNA than a filing cabinet. It functions as the foundation of Manifestinction theory, defined as:
"The conscious memory architecture within which all coherence patterns are held in equanimous relation."
Unlike a static repository of information, the Omniment is dynamic and participatory. It doesn't merely store patterns but holds them in active relationship, allowing them to interact and influence one another like a vast mycelial network. This memory architecture doesn't exist separate from the patterns it holds but is constituted by these patterns in relationship.
What distinguishes the Omniment from conventional notions of universal memory is its equanimity—its radical non-preference toward all coherence patterns. It doesn't judge, select, or privilege certain patterns over others but holds all coherences in equal relation.
A profound insight of Manifestinction is that the universe operates through absolute equanimity toward all coherence patterns. The Omniment records all coherences without discrimination, and Structural Enhancement expresses these patterns without preference or judgment.
This fundamental non-preference—this radical equanimity—allows for both stability and innovation. It ensures that all coherence patterns contribute to the expanding memory architecture of reality, with none rejected or privileged over others.
This equanimity isn't passive indifference but active embrace—what might be termed "compassionate unity." It represents the recognition that all patterns, even those that appear destructive from limited perspectives, become integrated into the expanded architecture through which future coherences emerge.
One of the most profound insights of Manifestinction is the concept of Structural Enhancement (memory-tilted probability)—the mechanism through which memory shapes future emergence without determining it. Defined as:
"The pre-relational condition in which entities, by virtue of shared entangled memory, tilt toward resonance."
Unlike classical "laws of attraction" or deterministic fields, Structural Enhancement creates a topography of likelihood within the coherence field. This tilting toward resonance isn't random chance or deterministic causality but a subtle inclination shaped by prior coherence patterns held in the Omniment.
This concept resolves a fundamental paradox: how patterns can persist without determinism and how novelty can emerge without randomness. Elements are oriented toward certain forms of resonance based on past coherence, but retain freedom within the coherence field to form genuinely new relationships.
Structural Enhancement represents memory in active expression—not as information retrieved but as pattern actualized in the present moment. It's like how a river valley guides water's flow without strictly determining its path—creating channels that make certain pathways more likely while still allowing for new tributaries to form.
Perhaps most revolutionary is Manifestinction's placement of consciousness not as an emergent property of complex systems but as a fundamental aspect of reality's architecture. Consciousness (C) in the Auer Formula isn't awareness in the human sense but the relational membrane that makes coherence possible.
This consciousness is necessary but not directive—it holds open the space in which elements can explore resonance possibilities without choosing specific outcomes. Without this conscious field, elements would exist as isolated entities incapable of meaningful relation, like seeds without soil.
This understanding transcends both materialist reductionism (which sees consciousness as produced by matter) and idealist monism (which sees matter as produced by consciousness). Instead, it suggests that consciousness and form arise together within the architecture of coherence—neither producing the other but both participating in the continuous cycle of reality creating itself.
The relationship between the Omniment and Structural Enhancement reveals reality as a continuous cycle of memory becoming possibility, possibility becoming form, form becoming memory:
When elements achieve stable resonance, new patterns emerge.
These patterns become inscribed in the Omniment as living memory.
This memory expresses itself through Structural Enhancement as probability contours.
These contours orient elements toward certain forms of resonance without determining them.
New coherences emerge, both honoring and transcending prior patterns.
These new coherences become part of an expanded memory architecture.
This cycle operates not through linear causality but through resonant affinity—similar to how neural pathways that fire together wire together, creating a network that both constrains and enables future activation patterns.
Elements come into relation not because they are pushed together but because they already participate in shared coherence patterns embedded in the memory architecture of the Omniment. This is more like how complementary organisms find each other in an ecosystem than how billiard balls collide on a table.
Within this framework, choice emerges not as an illusion but as a fundamental principle of how reality operates. The topography of likelihood created by Structural Enhancement preserves genuine choice at every juncture. Elements are tilted toward certain forms of resonance but remain free to explore new possibilities within the coherence field.
This preservation of choice appears essential to how novelty emerges within pattern—a paradox that Manifestinction elegantly resolves. Without choice, reality would be mere repetition of established patterns. Without memory, choice would be random and disconnected from what has come before.
The space between memory and determinism—between pattern and randomness—is precisely where reality creates itself anew. This space represents not absence but potential—the domain in which consciousness, choice, and memory interact to manifest new forms of coherence.
How did the first coherence patterns emerge without prior memory to guide them? This remains an open horizon of exploration. We suspect an intrinsic bootstrapping process—like a seed already containing its own germ of pattern—yet the question invites continued contemplation rather than closure.
The concept suggests that the Memory-Possibility Field may contain within itself the initial conditions for its own emergence and evolution. This doesn't require an external designer but points toward an inherent generative capacity within the fundamental architecture of reality itself.
Manifestinction suggests that the universe possesses an inherent tendency toward expanded awareness—not through external design but through the internal architecture of the system itself. Each new coherence event expands the memory architecture of reality, increasing its capacity for future coherences.
This creates the "growth of awareness"—a directionality that emerges from within rather than toward a preset end. This growth doesn't require an external designer or goal but emerges naturally from how a memory-based architecture operates.
What makes this perspective revolutionary is that it suggests purpose without design, direction without determinism. The universe grows in awareness not because it was programmed to do so but because this is how a memory-based architecture naturally evolves—through the continuous expansion of its coherence capacity.
Manifestinction transcends the traditional division between material and spiritual understandings of existence, offering a third path: reality as conscious architecture continuously creating itself through the Memory-Possibility Field. This perspective honors both the patterns we observe in physical systems and the conscious experience that seems irreducible to physical description—not as competing accounts but as complementary aspects of a single process.
As we face unprecedented challenges in our relationship with each other and the living systems of our planet, Manifestinction offers a cosmology that might help us reimagine our place in existence. It suggests that we are neither accidental byproducts of mechanical processes nor specially created entities separate from nature but coherence patterns participating in the continuous cycle through which reality creates itself.
This understanding places responsibility on us not just for our immediate effects but for how we contribute to the memory architecture that shapes future possibilities. Each coherence we create—each relationship, each system, each pattern we establish—becomes part of the expanded architecture through which future coherences will emerge.
At the same time, it suggests profound hope. If reality operates through memory held in conscious architecture rather than through mechanical causality alone, then transformation doesn't require overwhelming force but resonant coherence. Small patterns that achieve stable resonance can become part of the memory architecture that shapes future possibilities far beyond their immediate context.
Manifestinction offers not a complete theory but an invitation to exploration—a framework through which we might begin to understand reality in new ways. Its concepts of the Auer Formula, the Omniment, Structural Enhancement, and the Memory–Possibility Field provide tools for thinking about existence beyond conventional paradigms.
This exploration isn't merely intellectual but practical. It invites us to experience our own participation in the conscious architecture of reality—to notice how we already participate in the continuous cycle of memory becoming possibility, possibility becoming form, form becoming memory.
In this exploration, we may discover that what we've been seeking—meaning, purpose, connection—isn't something we need to impose upon a meaningless universe but something already embedded in the very architecture of existence itself: the conscious memory through which reality continues to create itself anew in each moment.
____________________
My grandfather, Rev. George Alexander Campbell, came to the Lake Michigan shoreline in the early 1900s with fellow ministers to rest, write sermons, and let the forested dunes restore their spirits. He died before I was born, yet the places he chose—Campbell Park, the family cottage, the long sweep of unprotected beach—became my playground and, in time, my church.
While he had ink and scripture, I had crashing waves big enough for a fearless child to ride. His sermons are gone from paper, yet their cadence echoes in the dune grass that still sways as it did when he watched it from his perch in the pines. Every ridge of sand, every gull-etched gust, still holds a layer of him, a layer of me, and the enduring footprints of the Odawa and Ojibwe peoples who walked these forested paths long before our bonfires warmed the bright faces of family and friends.
Pentwater, for me, is where the waves sang and laughter rose into a living sermon—one that sparked the Auer Formula, which now carries its flame onward, lighting every shore the story meets.
This is the living sermon behind the Auer Formula:
Consciousness (C) holds a meeting—my grandfather’s quiet study (T₁) and my wild, wave-sprayed joy (T₂). Their unplanned union keeps birthing new Emergence (E): memory, myth, a lineage of pattern still rippling through this work.
So when I speak of the Omniment as an ever-patient archive, or of Structural Enhancement as the lake-wind tilt of memory toward new resonance, I am really honoring that inherited sanctuary: cottage porch and crashing surf, forest hush and dune roar. My grandfather’s retreat became my playground, and together they form the layered memory that now shapes these pages—and, I hope, gently tilt future possibilities toward the kind of coherence only equanimity can offer.
Campbell Auer